Controlling security with workflow
Workflow is used in Plone for three distinct, but overlapping purposes:
- To keep track of metadata, chiefly an object’s state;
- to create content review cycles and model other types of processes;
- to manage object security.
When writing content types, we will often create custom workflows to go with them. In this section, we will explain at a high level how Plone’s workflow system works, and then show an example of a simple workflow to go with our example types. An exhaustive manual on using workflows is beyond the scope of this manual, but hopefully this will cover the basics.
There is nothing Dexterity-specific in this section. Everything here applies equally well to content objects created with Archetypes or using CMF directly.
A DCWorkflow refresher¶
What follows is a fairly detailed description of DCWorkflow, originally posted here. You may find some of this a little detailed on first reading, so feel free to skip to the specifics later on. However, it is useful to be familiar with the high level concepts. You’re unlikely to need multi-workflow chains in your first few attempts at workflow, for instance, but it’s useful to know what it is if you come across the term.
Plone’s workflow system is known as DCWorkflow. It is a states-and-transitions system, which means that your workflow starts in a particular state (the initial state) and then moves to other states via transitions (also called actions in CMF).
When an object enters a particular state (including the initial state),
the workflow is given a chance to update permissions on the object.
A workflow manages a number of permissions –
typically the “core” CMF permissions
like View, Modify portal content and so on –
and will set those on the object at each state change.
Note that this is event-driven, rather than a real-time security check:
only by changing the state is the security information updated.
This is why you need to click Update security settings
at the bottom of the
screen in the ZMI when you change your workflows’ security settings and
want to update existing objects.
A state can also assign local roles to groups.
This is akin to assigning roles to groups on Plone’s Sharing tab,
but the mapping of roles to groups happens on each state change,
much like the mapping of roles to permissions.
Thus, you can say that in the
members of the Secondary reviewers group
have the Reviewer local role.
This is powerful stuff when combined with the more usual role-to-permission
mapping, although it is not very commonly used.
State changes result in a number of variables being recorded,
such as the actor (the user that invoked the transition),
the action (the name of the transition),
the date and time and so on.
The list of variables is dynamic,
so each workflow can define any number of variables
linked to TALES expressions that are invoked
to calculate the current value at the point of transition.
The workflow also keeps track of the current state of each object.
The state is exposed as a special type of workflow variable
called the state variable.
Most workflows in Plone uses the name
review_state as the state variable.
Workflow variables are recorded for each state change in the workflow history. This allows you to see when a transition occurred, who effected it, and what state the object was in before or after. In fact, the “current state” of the workflow is internally looked up as the most recent entry in the workflow history.
Workflow variables are also the basis for worklists.
These are basically pre-defined catalog queries
run against the current set of workflow variables.
Plone’s review portlet shows all current worklists
from all installed workflows.
This can be a bit slow,
but it does mean that you can use a single portlet
to display an amalgamated list of all items on all worklists
that apply to the current user.
Most Plone workflows have a single worklist
that matches on the
e.g. showing all items in the
If states are the static entities in the workflow system, transitions (actions) provide the dynamic parts. Each state defines zero or more possible exit transitions, and each transition defines exactly one target state, though it is possible to mark a transition as “stay in current state”. This can be useful if you want to do something in reaction to a transition and record that the transition happened in the workflow history, but not change the state (or security) of the object.
Transitions are controlled by one or more guards. These can be permissions (the preferred approach), roles (mostly useful for the Owner role – in other cases it is normally better to use permissions) or TALES expressions. A transition is available if all its guard conditions are true. A transition with no guard conditions is available to everyone (including anonymous!).
Transitions are user-triggered by default, but may be automatic. An automatic transition triggers immediately following another transition provided its guard conditions pass. It will not necessarily trigger as soon as the guard condition becomes true, as that would involve continually re-evaluating guards for all active workflows on all objects!
When a transition is triggered,
These are low-level events from
Products.DCWorkflow that can tell you a
lot about the previous and current states.
There is a higher level
that is more commonly used to react after a workflow action has completed.
In addition to the events, you can configure workflow scripts. These are either created through-the-web or (more commonly) as External Methods [*], and may be set to execute before a transition is complete (i.e. before the object enters the target state) or just after it has been completed (the object is in the new state). Note that if you are using event handlers, you’ll need to check the event object to find out which transition was invoked, since the events are fired on all transitions. The per-transition scripts are only called for the specific transitions for which they were configured.
|[*]||An External Method is a Python script evaluated in Zope context. See Logic Objects in the Zope 2 Book.|
Workflows are mapped to types via the
There is a default workflow, indicated by the string
Some types have no workflow,
which means that they hold no state information and
typically inherit permissions from their parent.
It is also possible for types to have multiple workflows.
You can list multiple workflows by separating their names by commas.
This is called a workflow chain.
Note that in Plone, the workflow chain of an object is looked up by
multi-adapting the object and the workflow to the
The adapter factory should return a tuple of string workflow names
IWorkflowChain is a specialisation of
IReadSequence, i.e. a tuple).
The default obviously looks at the mappings in the
but it is possible to override the mapping,
e.g. by using a custom adapter registered for some marker interface,
which in turn could be provided by a type-specific behavior.
Multiple workflows applied in a single chain co-exist in time.
Typically, you need each workflow in the chain to have a different state
portal_workflow API (in particular,
doActionFor(), which is used to change the state of an object)
also assumes the transition ids are unique.
If you have two workflows in the chain and both currently have a
only the first workflow will be transitioned if you do
Plone will show all available transitions from all workflows in the current
object’s chain in the
so you do not need to create any custom UI for this.
However, Plone always assumes the state variable is called
(which is also the variable indexed in
Therefore, the state of a secondary workflow won’t show up
unless you build some custom UI.
In terms of security, remember that the role-to-permission (and group-to-local-role) mappings are event-driven and are set after each transition. If you have two concurrent workflows that manage the same permissions, the settings from the last transition invoked will apply. If they manage different permissions (or there is a partial overlap) then only the permissions managed by the most-recently-invoked workflow will change, leaving the settings for other permissions untouched.
Multiple workflows can be very useful in case you have concurrent processes.
For example, an object may be published, but require translation.
You can track the review state in the main workflow
and the translation state in another.
If you index the state variable for the second workflow in the catalog
(the state variable is always available on the indexable object wrapper
so you only need to add an index with the appropriate name
you can search for all objects pending translation,
for example using a Collection.
Creating a new workflow¶
With the theory out of the way, let’s show how to create a new workflow.
Workflows are managed in the
portal_workflow tool. You can use the ZMI
to create new workflows and assign them to types. However, it is usually
preferable to create an installable workflow configuration using
GenericSetup. By default, each workflow as well as the workflow
assignments are imported and exported using an XML syntax. This syntax
is comprehensive, but rather verbose if you are writing it manually.
For the purposes of this manual, we will show an alternative
configuration syntax based on spreadsheets (in CSV format). This is
provided by the collective.wtf package. You can read more about the
details of the syntax in its documentation. Here, we will only show how
to use it to create a simple workflow for the
Session type, allowing
members to submit sessions for review.
collective.wtf, we need to depend on it.
setup.py, we have:
install_requires=[ ... 'collective.wtf', ],
As before, the
<includeDependencies /> line in
takes care of configuring the package for us.
A workflow definition using
collective.wtf consists of a CSV file in
which we will create,
workflows.xml file in
which maps types to workflows.
The workflow mapping in
profiles/default/workflows.xml looks like
<?xml version="1.0"?> <object name="portal_workflow"> <bindings> <type type_id="example.conference.session"> <bound-workflow workflow_id="example.conference.session_workflow"/> </type> </bindings> </object>
The CSV file itself is found in
It contains the following,
which was exported to CSV from an OpenOffice spreadsheet.
You can find the original spreadsheet with the
example.conference source code. This applies some useful formatting,
which is obviously lost in the CSV version.
For your own workflows, you may want to use this template as a starting point.
"[Workflow]" "Id:","example.conference.session_workflow" "Title:","Conference session workflow" "Description:","Allows members to submit session proposals for review" "Initial state:","draft" "[State]" "Id:","draft" "Title:","Draft" "Description:","The proposal is being drafted." "Transitions","submit" "Permissions","Acquire","Anonymous","Authenticated","Member","Manager","Owner","Editor","Reader","Contributor","Reviewer" "View","N",,,,"X","X","X","X",, "Access contents information","N",,,,"X","X","X","X",, "Modify portal content","N",,,,"X","X","X",,, "[State]" "Id:","pending" "Title:","Pending" "Description:","The proposal is pending review" "Worklist:","Pending review" "Worklist label:","Conference sessions pending review" "Worklist guard permission:","Review portal content" "Transitions:","reject, publish" "Permissions","Acquire","Anonymous","Authenticated","Member","Manager","Owner","Editor","Reader","Contributor","Reviewer" "View","N",,,,"X","X","X","X",,"X" "Access contents information","N",,,,"X","X","X","X",,"X" "Modify portal content","N",,,,"X","X","X",,,"X" "[State]" "Id:","published" "Title:","Published" "Description:","The proposal has been accepted" "Transitions:","reject" "Permissions","Acquire","Anonymous","Authenticated","Member","Manager","Owner","Editor","Reader","Contributor","Reviewer" "View","Y","X",,,,,,,, "Access contents information","Y","X",,,,,,,, "Modify portal content","Y",,,,"X","X","X",,, "[Transition]" "Id:","submit" "Title:","Submit" "Description:","Submit the session for review" "Target state:","pending" "Guard permission:","Request review" "[Transition]" "Id:","reject" "Title:","Reject" "Description:","Reject the session from the program" "Target state:","draft" "Guard permission:","Review portal content" "[Transition]" "Id:","publish" "Title:","Publish" "Description:","Accept and publish the session proposal" "Target state:","published" "Guard permission:","Review portal content"
Here, you can see several states and transitions. Each state contains a role/permission map, and a list of the possible exit transitions. Each transition contains a target state and other meta-data such as a title and a description, as well as guard permissions.
Like most other GenericSetup import steps, the workflow uses the Zope 2 permission title when referring to permissions.
When the package is (re-)installed, this workflow should be available
portal_workflow and mapped to the
If you have existing instances, don’t forget to go to
in the ZMI and click Update security settings
at the bottom of the page.
This ensures that existing objects reflect the most recent security
settings in the workflow.
A note about add permissions¶
This workflow assumes that regular members can add Session proposals to
Programs, which are then reviewed.
Previously, we granted the
example.conference: Add session permission to the
This is necessary, but not sufficient
to allow members to add sessions to programs.
The user will also need the generic
Add portal content permission in the
There are two ways to achieve this:
- Build a workflow for the
Programtype that manages this permission
- Use the Sharing tab to grant Can add to the Authenticated Users group. This grants the Contributor local role to members. By default, this role is granted the Add portal content permission.